The question should be reformulated: it is C Level Executive List not about representing the “after”, but about asking ourselves about the sediments of what is already happening. The “after” is not estimated or anticipated as if it were a sporting or electoral C Level Executive List outcome: the “after” is more like a collective –undirected– reinvention that is already underway. It is in the "after", which we are already developing, where we find the unknown but C Level Executive List also the combat. The post-pandemic is not only unknown, it is also a disputed field. The "new normal" is, above all, a territory under construction.
Because does not only refer to the C Level Executive List normal as «the frequent», but fundamentally to the normalized. Normality, as we conceived and practiced it until two months ago, is today suspended and, moreover, questioned. Meanwhile, there C Level Executive List are shifted in public opinion and in the dominant beliefs that underlie political activity, which could be configuring new normality based on the questioning of pre-existing (ab)normalities. The first C Level Executive List aspect of the discussion, or construction, concerns the temporality of what we are living, the figure under which we represent this time.
Is it an exceptional and temporary C Level Executive List parenthesis after whose end the pre-existing «normality» will be recreated? Or is it really a deeper and more lasting metamorphosis? More or less honestly, the answers that have been given in the public debate mix desires, interests and ideologies. The neoliberal narrative begins to preventively C Level Executive List show its teeth against empowered governments, against these national States with renewed centrality. His interventions reveal, without too much dissimulation, a clear subtext: "Be C Level Executive List careful not to confuse this license with a new normality." The idea of "permitted attributions" is suggested; but allowed by whom, allowed for what?